identify points in the peer review cycle that seem especially important and explain why

Would you like us to handle your paper? Use our company for better grades and meet your deadlines.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

The purpose of this assignment is to learn about information literacy by exploring the concept of peer review. You may be familiar with peer review in prior writing courses, but what does it mean when you talk about peer review in relation to academic source material? Click on the following link to a DeVry University Library presentation of Peer Reviewed Journals: The Creation of New Knowledge. http://library.devry.edu/pdfs/Peer_Review_PPT.pdf (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. The PDF presentation contains 20 slides that will introduce the peer review cycle.

After reviewing the presentation, compose a 2-paragraph response in which you address each of the following points:

  • In your own words, identify points in the peer review cycle that seem especially important and explain why.
  • How does an editor differ from a peer reviewer? Use at least two points to support your response.
  • Based on this information, explain whether your article for this week was peer reviewed? How can you determine this information?
  • As you work on your research in this class, where specifically can you look to find peer-reviewed information?

Submit your assignment by the due date.

Rubric

ENGL 147N Week 2 Info Literacy Assignment Rubric (35pts)

ENGL 147N Week 2 Info Literacy Assignment Rubric (35pts)

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdequately identifies points in the peer review cycle that seem important and explains why.

5.0 pts

Full Marks

3.0 pts

Rating Description

2.0 pts

Rating Description

0.0 pts

No Marks

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdequately explains how an editor differs from a peer reviewer with at least two points for support.

10.0 pts

Full Marks

3.0 pts

Rating Description

2.0 pts

Rating Description

0.0 pts

No Marks

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdequately explains whether or not the article was peer reviewed and how this was determined.

10.0 pts

Full Marks

3.0 pts

Rating Description

2.0 pts

Rating Description

0.0 pts

No Marks

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness and Deadlines

5.0 pts

Full Marks

3.0 pts

Rating Description

2.0 pts

Rating Description

0.0 pts

No Marks

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Writing Quality

5.0 pts

Full Marks

3.0 pts

Rating Description

2.0 pts

Rating Description

0.0 pts

No Marks

5.0 pts

Total Points: 35.0

Once you get frustrated and struggling to accomplish your work on time, you need online assignment help. We understand your needs and provides you with reliable writing specialists to complete your projects at an affordable price.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Looking for this or a Similar Assignment? Click below to Place your Order

×

Hello!

Click one of our contacts below to chat on WhatsApp

× How can I help you?