Details:In this assignment, learners are required to write a case report addressing the personal knowledge and skills gained in the current course and potentially solving an identified practice proble

Would you like us to handle your paper? Use our company for better grades and meet your deadlines.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper


Details:

In this assignment, learners are required to write a case report addressing the personal knowledge and skills gained in the current course and potentially solving an identified practice problem.


General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • Use primary sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used.
  • Your case report should be no more than 10 double-spaced pages, including references.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.


Directions:

Choose a specific focus of patient practice (e.g., acute care hospital, clinic, primary care, long-term care, home health). Select a particular disease process (congestive heart failure, fall, diabetes, etc.). Identify and fully describe a technology element that could be involved in providing care to a patient with your selected disease process and the patient practice. Define how this technology will integrate treatment, monitoring or communication from the identified care setting to the home and then to ongoing care through the clinic.

Your case report must include the following:

  1. Introduction with a problem statement and your disease process described from the focus of patient practice.
  2. Synthesized literature review.
  3. Description of the case/situation/conditions. Use a real life patient situation or condition to describe your case, including the problems the patient encounters and the barriers to care.
  4. Describe at least one technology that may be used as a solution to the patient situation or condition described in your case.
  5. Describe how the technology can be used specifically in the case you have proposed.
  6. Summary of the case integrating proposed solutions(s).
  7. Conclusion.


Portfolio Practice Hours:

It may be possible to earn Portfolio Practice hours for this case report. Enter the following after the references section of your paper:



Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-805


I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

Details:In this assignment, learners are required to write a case report addressing the personal knowledge and skills gained in the current course and potentially solving an identified practice proble
Week 7 Assignment Instructions This is a Doctoral Program Health Informatics The Tutor MUST have good command of the English written language Details: In this assignment, learners are required to write a case report addressing the personal knowledge and skills gained in the current course and potentially solving an identified practice problem. General Guidelines: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. Use primary sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used. Your case report should be no more than 10 double-spaced pages, including references. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Directions: Choose a specific focus of patient practice (e.g., acute care hospital, clinic, primary care, long-term care, home health). Select a particular disease process (congestive heart failure, fall, diabetes, etc.). Identify and fully describe a technology element that could be involved in providing care to a patient with your selected disease process and the patient practice. Define how this technology will integrate treatment, monitoring or communication from the identified care setting to the home and then to ongoing care through the clinic. Your case report must include the following: Introduction with a problem statement and your disease process described from the focus of patient practice. Synthesized literature review. Description of the case/situation/conditions. Use a real life patient situation or condition to describe your case, including the problems the patient encounters and the barriers to care. Describe at least one technology that may be used as a solution to the patient situation or condition described in your case. Describe how the technology can be used specifically in the case you have proposed. Summary of the case integrating proposed solutions(s). Conclusion. Portfolio Practice Hours: It may be possible to earn Portfolio Practice hours for this case report. Enter the following after the references section of your paper: Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-805 I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor. Apply Rubrics Case Report: Health Care Informatics    1Unsatisfactory0.00% 2Less Than Satisfactory74.00% 3Satisfactory79.00% 4Good87.00% 5Excellent100.00% 70.0 %Content   15.0 %Identification and Description of Applicable Care-Based Technologies Identification and description of applicable care-based technologies are not present. Identification and description of applicable care-based technologies are present but incomplete. Identification and description of applicable care-based technologies are present but done at a perfunctory level. Identification and description of applicable care-based technologies are clearly presented and in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Identification and description of applicable care-based technologies are clearly presented and in full. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 15.0 %Discussion of the Integration of Technologies and Treatment/Monitoring in Applicable Care Settings Discussion of integration of technologies and treatment/monitoring in applicable care settings is not present. Discussion of integration of technologies and treatment/monitoring in applicable care settings is present but incomplete. Discussion of integration of technologies and treatment/monitoring in applicable care settings is present but done at a perfunctory level. Discussion of integration of technologies and treatment/monitoring in applicable care settings is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Discussion of integration of technologies and treatment/monitoring in applicable care settings is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 5.0 %Introduction and Problem Statement An introduction with problem statement is not present. An introduction with problem statement is present but incomplete. An introduction with problem statement is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. An introduction with problem statement is present, clear, and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. An introduction with problem statement is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 5.0 %Brief Literature Review A brief literature review is not present. A brief literature review is present but incomplete. A brief literature review is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 5.0 %Description of the Case, Situation, or Conditions A description of the case, situation, or conditions is not present. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is present but incomplete. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 5.0 %Detailed Explanation of the Synthesized Literature Findings A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is not present. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is present but incomplete. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 5.0 %Case Summary A case summary is not present. A case summary is present but incomplete. A case summary is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A case summary is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A case summary is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 10.0 %Proposed Solutions to Remedy Identified Technology Gaps, Inefficiencies, or Other Issues Proposed solutions are not presented. Proposed solutions are presented but are incomplete. Proposed solutions are presented but are rendered at a perfunctory level. Proposed solutions are clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Proposed solutions are clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 5.0 %Conclusion A conclusion is not presented. A conclusion is presented but is incomplete. A conclusion is presented but is rendered at a perfunctory level. A conclusion is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A conclusion is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness   7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 10.0 %Format   5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. 5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style Sources are not documented Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 100 %Total Weightage

Once you get frustrated and struggling to accomplish your work on time, you need online assignment help. We understand your needs and provides you with reliable writing specialists to complete your projects at an affordable price.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Looking for this or a Similar Assignment? Click below to Place your Order

×

Hello!

Click one of our contacts below to chat on WhatsApp

× How can I help you?